aiqw9182
Mar 23, 09:27 AM
Is it just me or does his right eye look odd? Is it a fake eye?
Yes, I believe he has a glass eye.
Yes, I believe he has a glass eye.
Mgkwho
Nov 4, 02:39 PM
People have already been commenting on future generations/revisions of the shuffle.
This is how I see the shuffle's roadmap:
Currently, it is at 1GB.
I think the next revision will bump it to 2GB at the same price point. That's what happened with the nano AND shuffle a year later. (although the shuffle did increase by $10, maybe due to the dock/form factor difference?)
My opinion is that they can not have two shuffles at 1GB and 2GB because of the price right now, and the intrusion into the nano market. Right now, prove me if I'm wrong, 2GB flash memory costs anywhere from $50-$100?
I also see Apple chopping off the part on the left that does not have controls. They will move the headphone jack over as well as the controls so that it fits in a 1"x1" section. That will probably be 3rd Gen, maybe at 4GB.
I think by the time 4GB becomes cheap/small enough to fit in an under $99 price point, they will be able to chop off that left side.
SO in my own opinion:
1GB at $79
becomes
2GB at $79 (sept '07 iPod Special Event)
becomes
4GB at $69 (sept '08 iPod Special Event) w/ left side chopped off. The reduction in price is just due to less material costs because of smaller size and advancements in manufacturing/technology.
I really do think it will take two years to see a 4GB shuffle because of size and price. Apple has historically doubled the size at the same price for the nano and shuffle, and granted that is only a year's work of data.
What does everyone think?
-=|Mgkwho
This is how I see the shuffle's roadmap:
Currently, it is at 1GB.
I think the next revision will bump it to 2GB at the same price point. That's what happened with the nano AND shuffle a year later. (although the shuffle did increase by $10, maybe due to the dock/form factor difference?)
My opinion is that they can not have two shuffles at 1GB and 2GB because of the price right now, and the intrusion into the nano market. Right now, prove me if I'm wrong, 2GB flash memory costs anywhere from $50-$100?
I also see Apple chopping off the part on the left that does not have controls. They will move the headphone jack over as well as the controls so that it fits in a 1"x1" section. That will probably be 3rd Gen, maybe at 4GB.
I think by the time 4GB becomes cheap/small enough to fit in an under $99 price point, they will be able to chop off that left side.
SO in my own opinion:
1GB at $79
becomes
2GB at $79 (sept '07 iPod Special Event)
becomes
4GB at $69 (sept '08 iPod Special Event) w/ left side chopped off. The reduction in price is just due to less material costs because of smaller size and advancements in manufacturing/technology.
I really do think it will take two years to see a 4GB shuffle because of size and price. Apple has historically doubled the size at the same price for the nano and shuffle, and granted that is only a year's work of data.
What does everyone think?
-=|Mgkwho
nburwell
Oct 9, 03:04 PM
I also just checked the App Store on my phone and it's not showing up yet.
ArchaicRevival
Apr 20, 09:12 PM
Apple played this one right from the get go, and no one can argue otherwise.
:apple:
:apple:
more...
viperGTS
May 6, 08:24 PM
2GMC devices cannot get 4.3.
Zeneth
Jan 1, 05:33 PM
Does anyone use their iphone with their ATV2 for a remote control?
Zeneth
Zeneth
more...
benjayman2
Apr 6, 01:16 AM
Photos rotate every 5 minutes, but this is what was up when I took a screen shot. Looks intimidating on the 27" iMac compared to my 17" MBP.
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/4853/screenshot20110406at521.png
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/4853/screenshot20110406at521.png
Nermal
Feb 13, 04:36 PM
Congrats guys. Glad to see you in there Nermal representing the antipodes :p
*SMACK!* :eek: :D
*SMACK!* :eek: :D
more...
WeeShoo
Jul 10, 11:17 AM
Hey guy's, I have a tangerine iBook G3 Clamshell. Everything is perfect on it except that I need to get a hard drive for it, and I need a faceplate for the CD drive. Here is a link to what that part looks like.
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-iBook-G3-Clamshell-CD-Faceplate/104/1
I've searched all over and cannot seem to find it anywhere, any help would be greatly appreciated.
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-iBook-G3-Clamshell-CD-Faceplate/104/1
I've searched all over and cannot seem to find it anywhere, any help would be greatly appreciated.
jayducharme
Mar 31, 10:52 AM
Very cool. Though I still can't see something like this reaching its full potential without a pressure sensitive stylus.
I disagree. There are plenty of people working with PS using just a mouse, which isn't pressure sensitive. Remember in the keynote demo of Garage Band, it was mentioned that Apple accomplished touch-sensitivity when you play an instrument by utilizing the accelerometer. I assume it could be the same for an imaging program.
I disagree. There are plenty of people working with PS using just a mouse, which isn't pressure sensitive. Remember in the keynote demo of Garage Band, it was mentioned that Apple accomplished touch-sensitivity when you play an instrument by utilizing the accelerometer. I assume it could be the same for an imaging program.
more...
MacBytes
Sep 1, 10:15 AM
http://www.macbytes.com/images/bytessig.gif (http://www.macbytes.com)
Category: News and Press Releases
Link: Trading Apple Ahead of Wednesday's Mystery Event (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20100901111502)
Description:: none
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Category: News and Press Releases
Link: Trading Apple Ahead of Wednesday's Mystery Event (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20100901111502)
Description:: none
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
gravytrain84
Mar 25, 03:19 PM
Get that **** outta here
more...
Abyssgh0st
Apr 10, 11:29 PM
Saw this in the dealership today. I want one. Who knows, when I have $118,000 I might give it a try :p
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4110/5602889077_c04c22a79b_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/)
Yellow Beast (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/) by Hisdem (http://www.flickr.com/people/maxumphoto/), on Flickr
$118,00? Really? I am floored that anyone would pay even half that for that car.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4110/5602889077_c04c22a79b_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/)
Yellow Beast (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/) by Hisdem (http://www.flickr.com/people/maxumphoto/), on Flickr
$118,00? Really? I am floored that anyone would pay even half that for that car.
Lord Blackadder
Mar 16, 06:03 PM
And you're only argument is "it's wrong".
Remind us all why murder is a crime in the first place?
Remind us all why murder is a crime in the first place?
more...
Frisco
Sep 26, 01:40 PM
Hi! I was thinking of buying an Apple iBook SE 366 MHZ G3 processor , 64 MB Ram off of ebay. Does anyone know if it has a DVD drive and how much RAM it can handle?
Frisco
Frisco
dba7dba
May 1, 02:24 PM
However, look at the profits and Apple makes around the same or more than the entire Samsung conglomerate with 1/5 the workforce.
samsung afaik OWNS and runs their own factories, largely is SK and other nations. their employees spend their salaries and pay taxes.
apple outsources all manufacturing. None in US. When what do they do with such big pile of cash made from not running factories? They park it in some overseas bank account to avoid paying tax to US.
Don't be fooled by headcount/profit ratio.
samsung afaik OWNS and runs their own factories, largely is SK and other nations. their employees spend their salaries and pay taxes.
apple outsources all manufacturing. None in US. When what do they do with such big pile of cash made from not running factories? They park it in some overseas bank account to avoid paying tax to US.
Don't be fooled by headcount/profit ratio.
more...
aegisdesign
Oct 6, 05:24 AM
That's why we use style tags to set a default font (yes, even in text areas) or fixed margins. If the W3 gives us the tools, then why should the browser render them void? That just makes no sense.
Safari is implementing a CSS3 feature with resizeable text areas. Apart from that, if your site design relies on fixed font sizes and text area sizes, they'll just break when the user Command-+/-'s the page. It will only break your site design if your site design is badly designed in the first place.
If you're worried about text areas overflowing other page elements then you can still use max-width and max-height to restrict growth and/or the overflow attribute so that scroll bars get introduced.
As one person pointed out in this thread, see the two arrows up ad down on the first line of the toolbar in this very textarea you type in to. It's very useful with long posts. That's why expandable text areas are a good idea.
It's actually not hard to do either. Look at http://www.aegisdesign.co.uk/examples/textarea/textexample.html and view the source for a simple example.
I'd disagree that designers should be making text areas 100% wide though. I've a 2560 wide screen. That'd be silly. Letting users on the other hand size it themselves and giving designers the tools to accommodate resizing is the way to go.
That's the most ridiculous statement I've read in this thread so far - and there are quite a few.
It's called the 'semantic web'. You may want to look it up. Decent web designers have been designing this way for some time where they can and the W3 want everyone to go this way.
The problem is of course with any of these new W3 features is that Microsoft have barely reached the basics in the CSS 2.1 standard yet in IE7. The chances of them supporting CSS3 anytime soon are slim. That means we'll still as designers have to support the older standards and only enlightened Firefox/Safari based designers will add on CSS3 based features should they prove compatible with IE7 and even IE6.
Safari is implementing a CSS3 feature with resizeable text areas. Apart from that, if your site design relies on fixed font sizes and text area sizes, they'll just break when the user Command-+/-'s the page. It will only break your site design if your site design is badly designed in the first place.
If you're worried about text areas overflowing other page elements then you can still use max-width and max-height to restrict growth and/or the overflow attribute so that scroll bars get introduced.
As one person pointed out in this thread, see the two arrows up ad down on the first line of the toolbar in this very textarea you type in to. It's very useful with long posts. That's why expandable text areas are a good idea.
It's actually not hard to do either. Look at http://www.aegisdesign.co.uk/examples/textarea/textexample.html and view the source for a simple example.
I'd disagree that designers should be making text areas 100% wide though. I've a 2560 wide screen. That'd be silly. Letting users on the other hand size it themselves and giving designers the tools to accommodate resizing is the way to go.
That's the most ridiculous statement I've read in this thread so far - and there are quite a few.
It's called the 'semantic web'. You may want to look it up. Decent web designers have been designing this way for some time where they can and the W3 want everyone to go this way.
The problem is of course with any of these new W3 features is that Microsoft have barely reached the basics in the CSS 2.1 standard yet in IE7. The chances of them supporting CSS3 anytime soon are slim. That means we'll still as designers have to support the older standards and only enlightened Firefox/Safari based designers will add on CSS3 based features should they prove compatible with IE7 and even IE6.
tktaylor1
Apr 6, 11:30 PM
0-4!!!!! Go Rangers 6-0!!!!!!
I hate to use vulgar language but ***** YOU!!! I'm still a fan even if we go 0-162.
I hate to use vulgar language but ***** YOU!!! I'm still a fan even if we go 0-162.
Hilmi Hamidi
Oct 3, 06:45 AM
http://img257.imagevenue.com/loc205/th_04468_Untitled_122_205lo.jpg (http://img257.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=04468_Untitled_122_205lo.jpg)
JediZenMaster
Sep 6, 03:16 PM
Here is mine
http://i992.photobucket.com/albums/af45/Jedizenmaster/Screenshot2010-09-06at40528PM.png
http://i992.photobucket.com/albums/af45/Jedizenmaster/Screenshot2010-09-06at40528PM.png
AL2TEACH
Apr 8, 04:26 PM
gives me a chuckle :)
Melrose
Sep 12, 01:14 PM
To go with my dock posted in the other thread...
http://f.cl.ly/items/67bad6da2b8192d79eb2/Picture%2028.jpg
[link (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64005/Della%20Notte.jpg)]
http://f.cl.ly/items/67bad6da2b8192d79eb2/Picture%2028.jpg
[link (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64005/Della%20Notte.jpg)]
PCClone
Apr 7, 09:01 AM
Only issue I want fixed is wifi. Disconnects a lot.
skunk
Apr 5, 05:21 PM
How we appear should never be a criterion for how we are treated under law. Justice is supposed to be blind.
